With mobile app development growing rapidly, developers often wonder whether to use React or React Native for building their mobile applications. Both JavaScript libraries were created by Facebook and share some similar capabilities, but they have key differences that impact what types of apps can be built and their performance.
React first released in 2013 focuses on building declarative web-based user interfaces that run on the browser. React Native, released just two years later in 2015, allows developers to build performant native mobile apps for iOS and Android using React architecture. According to Statista, global mobile app revenues in 2023 are forecasted to grow to $935 billion dollars. So choosing the right framework is an important decision.
The goal of this article is to provide a detailed yet easy-to-understand comparison of React vs React Native to help developers select the right framework based on their mobile app needs and capabilities required. We will analyze key metrics like speed, platform support, access to native features, code reuse ability, required skills and more through benchmarks, data examples and practical considerations. By the end, you should have a firm grasp on when React or React Native is more appropriate for your mobile project idea and capabilities you want built.
The comparison overview will enable any intermediate JavaScript developer looking to build mobile applications understand where React performs better and where React Native outshines based on the type of mobile user interfaces and interactions required. Let's dive in!
React is an open-source JavaScript library created by Facebook focused on building fast, interactive user interfaces for web applications. Some key capabilities and purposes of React include:
React Native is an open-source mobile app framework created by Facebook that allows developers to build native iOS and Android apps using React architecture. Some core capabilities include:
While React and React Native share React architecture, there are some major differences:
The fundamental difference is React Native uses the same React framework but compiles written JavaScript code into native views instead of web views as React does.
Performance is a key consideration when choosing a framework for mobile application development. Some key performance metrics we will compare include startup time, UI render speed, app size and limitations.
According to Dev.to benchmarks, React Native has a slower cold start, taking 470 ms to become interactive compared to React's 170 ms. This is likely due to the JavaScript environment setup required by React Native. However, React Native has faster UI rendering speeds at 28-30 FPS versus React's 44 FPS.
For context, native mobile development using Java/Kotlin (Android) and Objective-C/Swift (iOS) score even faster for both startup time and UI rendering. But React Native is impressive given it uses JavaScript and still nears native performance.
In terms of app size, React Native also compares favorably to native app development. Example app sizes for medium complexity apps are:
So React Native enables significantly lower app sizes than native while React web app sizes can vary dramatically depending on assets usage.
However, React Native does face some limitations for more complex graphic intensive apps. For example, React Native relies on a JavaScript thread and communication bridge which can cause lags for complex list views or animations. Games and 3D model apps still benefit from fully native development. React with web libraries like WebGL can build graphic rich apps unsupported by React Native.
Overall for most typical apps, React Native provides excellent startup time and smooth UI rendering that matches reasonably to fully native mobile development while providing size benefits. But graphic/animation intense apps see advantages choosing native or React web development.
Both have strong backing for growth. But React as a more mature solution has longer track record so far. React Native direction very positive given Facebook dependence and community interest.
Conclusion:
React and React Native share core conceptual similarities but have key distinctions that dictate their ideal mobile app development use cases. React's strength is building complex browser-based web application interfaces with extensive community libraries for needs like state management and UI animations. It provides unmatched flexibility and interactivity for web experiences.
Meanwhile, React Native makes native mobile development accessible for web developers leveraging JavaScript and React patterns. It compiles performant iOS and Android app UIs capable of tapping into device hardware like camera and GPS more easily than web apps can access. Tradeoffs come in more limited community components and growing pains building highly complex animated interfaces.
Weighing their capabilities, React shines for apps deeply integrated into device features or requiring very intensive visual experiences like games. It unlocks native compilation and hardware APIs inaccessible from the browser constraints. On the other hand, React remains supreme for highly interactive web applications. Choices come down to whether native device access or browser-based experienced matter more.